Pioneer ct-95 vs. pioneer ct-S920s

[Alshalan]

Hi,

I have noticed those two cassette decks from Pioneer have very high similarity. They are CT-95 and CT-S920s . Both are Hi-End and deserve to put around $900 on a used one *thumbsup*

The only differences I've identified are:

Frequency Response :
CT-95: 10-30 (Metal)
CT-S920s 10-25 (Metal)

Signal-to-Noise Ration (Dolby off):
CT-95: more than 64 dB
CT-S920s more than 63 dB

Power consumption 95 consumes 2 Watt more, with 0.6 Kg extra in weight.

The rest are the same, they both introduced in 1993.

[A.N.T.]

Hi,

I have noticed those two cassette decks from Pioneer have very high similarity. They are CT-95 and CT-S920s . Both are Hi-End and deserve to put around $900 on a used one *thumbsup*

The only differences I've identified are:

Frequency Response :
CT-95: 10-30 (Metal)
CT-S920s 10-25 (Metal)

Signal-to-Noise Ration (Dolby off):
CT-95: more than 64 dB
CT-S920s more than 63 dB

Power consumption 95 consumes 2 Watt more, with 0.6 Kg extra in weight.

The rest are the same, they both introduced in 1993.

CT-95 and CT-S920S - the same deck, even the service manual is the same. I don't like the MOS switching in it thought.

Alex

[vince666]

Frequency Response :
CT-95: 10-30 (Metal)
CT-S920s 10-25 (Metal)


anyway, these frequency responses are for +/- 6dB and not +/- 3dB as they usually do. *wink*