Scorpion8
07-31-2008, 10:06 PM
There are good and bad tape deck displays. Some of them enhance the taping experience, and some of them distract from it and make it a hassle.
For example, early H/K cassette decks used these side by side both left to right operating meters that were terrible. Your eyes had to read the level on one side, jump to the other channel, and by that time the tape level had changed. Setting record levels was difficult at best with a peak reading meter on an active source such as rock. At night they look fun, but that was about it.
HK CD91
http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p141/Scorpion008/HKsidebyside.jpg
Another poor example is the Nakamichi decks. For all of their prowess, these top-strung meters also have their problems. For example, same issue as above. Reading one channel and trying to gauge the level and then jump to the other side is problematic at best. Plus, since they are hung from the top center, the natural psycho-tendency of the eye is to allow them to fall straight down. Again, there are better examples.
Nak 581
http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p141/Scorpion008/NakTop-end.jpg
Nak 480
http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p141/Scorpion008/NakTopend02.jpg
Much better than the top-danglers, were the bottom-centers. Although the same issue persists (eye movement back and forth) the eye finds it hard to take in both meters at the same time and gauge a common level. Active sources were fun to try and track. But the tendency of the mind to allow the meter to fall to the side was much better than the hang-down-in-the-center danglers.
Technics RS-M227x
http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p141/Scorpion008/TechnicsBottomend.jpg
Much, much, much better was the opposed meters. By opposed, I mean they face each other. As the source signal runs thru the meter, it is very easy for the eye to average the signal between the two channels and find a common record level. Here are two superb examples, although they could use thicker meter needles on both:
Teac V-1RX
http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p141/Scorpion008/TeacOpposed.jpg
and Akai CS-M3
http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p141/Scorpion008/AkaiOpposed.jpg
But we could still make improvements in the ergonomics. The advent of bar graph displays mostly coincided with the mass production of LEDs and finally flourescent displays. Here's a good example of a parallel bar graph using LEDs. The drawback is that it has very few segments, so it's much more "coarse" in it's adjustment ability. The few segments make it rougher, but the LEDs are sparkly nice!
NAD 6155
http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p141/Scorpion008/NADLED.jpg
Some better examples are these two flourescent displays of parallel bar graphs. They have many more segments, so if you had a level-adjustment tape you could zero in very close to exactly the same on each channel. Much easier than the coarse NAD display above. Also, you could get peak-or-average reading displays as IC became prevalent in PCB fabrication. Setting a bar-graph type display with an averging level display was a joy.
Technics RS-M226
http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p141/Scorpion008/TechnicsFlourescent.jpg
Akai HX-R5
http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p141/Scorpion008/AkaiFlourescent.jpg
Denon DRM-710
http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p141/Scorpion008/DenonFlourescent.jpg
Everyone knows and wows at the Pioneer flouroscans, but I don't have any (not a Pioneer fan) so there's no good examples here. Maybe someone can post one. Personally, I'm a big fan of Denon and Akai decks. The Akai flourescent shown above is an absolutely beautiful display in any light, and is mesmerizing at night.
So thanks for enduring this. This is, as they say, IMHO. YMMV. Cheers!
For example, early H/K cassette decks used these side by side both left to right operating meters that were terrible. Your eyes had to read the level on one side, jump to the other channel, and by that time the tape level had changed. Setting record levels was difficult at best with a peak reading meter on an active source such as rock. At night they look fun, but that was about it.
HK CD91
http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p141/Scorpion008/HKsidebyside.jpg
Another poor example is the Nakamichi decks. For all of their prowess, these top-strung meters also have their problems. For example, same issue as above. Reading one channel and trying to gauge the level and then jump to the other side is problematic at best. Plus, since they are hung from the top center, the natural psycho-tendency of the eye is to allow them to fall straight down. Again, there are better examples.
Nak 581
http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p141/Scorpion008/NakTop-end.jpg
Nak 480
http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p141/Scorpion008/NakTopend02.jpg
Much better than the top-danglers, were the bottom-centers. Although the same issue persists (eye movement back and forth) the eye finds it hard to take in both meters at the same time and gauge a common level. Active sources were fun to try and track. But the tendency of the mind to allow the meter to fall to the side was much better than the hang-down-in-the-center danglers.
Technics RS-M227x
http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p141/Scorpion008/TechnicsBottomend.jpg
Much, much, much better was the opposed meters. By opposed, I mean they face each other. As the source signal runs thru the meter, it is very easy for the eye to average the signal between the two channels and find a common record level. Here are two superb examples, although they could use thicker meter needles on both:
Teac V-1RX
http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p141/Scorpion008/TeacOpposed.jpg
and Akai CS-M3
http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p141/Scorpion008/AkaiOpposed.jpg
But we could still make improvements in the ergonomics. The advent of bar graph displays mostly coincided with the mass production of LEDs and finally flourescent displays. Here's a good example of a parallel bar graph using LEDs. The drawback is that it has very few segments, so it's much more "coarse" in it's adjustment ability. The few segments make it rougher, but the LEDs are sparkly nice!
NAD 6155
http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p141/Scorpion008/NADLED.jpg
Some better examples are these two flourescent displays of parallel bar graphs. They have many more segments, so if you had a level-adjustment tape you could zero in very close to exactly the same on each channel. Much easier than the coarse NAD display above. Also, you could get peak-or-average reading displays as IC became prevalent in PCB fabrication. Setting a bar-graph type display with an averging level display was a joy.
Technics RS-M226
http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p141/Scorpion008/TechnicsFlourescent.jpg
Akai HX-R5
http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p141/Scorpion008/AkaiFlourescent.jpg
Denon DRM-710
http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p141/Scorpion008/DenonFlourescent.jpg
Everyone knows and wows at the Pioneer flouroscans, but I don't have any (not a Pioneer fan) so there's no good examples here. Maybe someone can post one. Personally, I'm a big fan of Denon and Akai decks. The Akai flourescent shown above is an absolutely beautiful display in any light, and is mesmerizing at night.
So thanks for enduring this. This is, as they say, IMHO. YMMV. Cheers!